Modern ITSM Requires Rethinking Knowledge Management

In a typical enterprise IT organization, knowledge management plays a central role in service delivery. Almost every IT service management implementation involves a knowledge management system, with defined tools and processes. However, despite widespread adoption, knowledge management often fails to deliver expected outcomes. The service desk struggles to resolve issues quickly. Self-service adoption remains inconsistent. Automation projects stall before they scale.

The ITSM toolkit evolves rapidly, while knowledge management practices often do not. As service desks leverage AI, automation, and experience-based service models, current knowledge management practices fail to meet enterprise needs.

“Knowledge management can no longer be treated as a supporting function within ITSM. In modern service desk environments, it must be reimagined as the intelligence layer that enables automation, consistency, and experience-led service delivery. Organizations that continue to rely on static, repository-based knowledge models will struggle to scale, adopt AI effectively, or meet rising expectations for speed and quality.”

Stephen SweettPresident & COO, Buchanan Technologies

Why Knowledge Management Underperforms Despite Widespread Adoption

Good intentions alone do not determine the success of knowledge management. Most organizations apply and implement knowledge management with sound fundamentals. However, the emphasis often remains on existence rather than effectiveness. Knowledge is there, but it does not drive behavior.

At the enterprise scale, this trend follows a regular pattern. Agents skip knowledge articles because searching often takes longer than resolving issues directly. End users avoid self-service platforms because answers feel outdated or incomplete. New employees rely on unofficial sources instead of collective knowledge. This erodes the value of knowledge over time.

20251229_section_thought-leadership-rethinking-knowledge_2_600x600-1

The paradox becomes clear. Organizations make substantial investments in KB/KM platforms, yet service outcomes fail to improve proportionately. Resolution times remain high. The usage rate for self-service remains stagnant. Automation initiatives lack the structured intelligence required to perform reliably.

This impact matters today as ITSM planning depends increasingly on knowledge. AI-powered service models increase the relevance of accurate and reliable knowledge. Automation relies on a shared understanding of problems and their resolutions. Experience-based service delivery depends on consistency. So, improper, or weak knowledge management hinders the entire ITSM ecosystem.

Where Traditional Knowledge Management Models Break Down

The source of this problem is not technology. The source lies in operating models. The conventional knowledge management system considers knowledge to be static. Article writing occurs after the ticket closure. Review cycles rely on manual audits. Ownership of knowledge tends to be either centralized or unclear. Updates lag behind environmental change.

This makes knowledge separate from work activity. Knowledge cannot respond to real-world conditions. Articles become outdated rapidly. Context is lost. Relevance is diminished.

20251229_section_thought-leadership-rethinking-knowledge_4_600x600

Agents are reluctant to use knowledge that gets in the way of the process. Too much work goes into capturing or retrieving knowledge. Unrelated information reduces the use of articles. Too much focus on sheer quantity degrades quality.

Scale further exposes the limits of legacy models. There is a need for knowledge that constantly adjusts to the demands of distributed service desks, heterogeneous environments, and varying user needs. Legacy, or static knowledge cannot keep up. Knowledge debt builds when service demands increase.

The ITSM Stack Evolves Faster Than Knowledge Management

In recent years, the scope of the service desk has increased considerably. The ITSM solutions support artificial intelligence-powered resolution, virtual agents, intelligent routing, and comprehensive employee experience. The stakeholders expect rapid resolution of issues, standard levels of service, and smooth and continuous interactions.

These capabilities move the focus of ITSM away from reactive support to proactive service enablement. Automation resolves routine problems. Virtual assistants offer immediate resolutions. Predictive analytics drive prioritization.

Thus, knowledge becomes the foundation for this operating model. Automation depends on structured knowledge. Virtual agents rely on reliable content.

20251229_section_thought-leadership-rethinking-knowledge_5_600x600

Reframing Knowledge Management as the Intelligence Layer of ITSM

Organizations delivering similar services have different approaches when it comes to knowledge. They view knowledge not just as a repository but position it as a system that lives and thrives within the service operations.

In this model, Enterprise Knowledge Management (EKM) occurs during issue resolution. Agents capture insights directly. Content improves through use, review, and republishing rather than rigid cycles. The governance process relies upon relevance and results.

This approach aligns with knowledge-centered services, but modern environments require a broader model. Scalability, automation, and experience require knowledge that adapts to changing environments.

20251229_section_thought-leadership-rethinking-knowledge_1_600x600

This knowledge applies across environments and roles.

At Buchanan Technologies, our service desk teams develop knowledge practices that are directly integrated into IT service management processes. We aim to embed knowledge development and reuse processes within day-to-day activities.

When knowledge becomes the intelligence layer of ITSM, it integrates people, processes, and technology. Automation occurs without ambiguity. Agents perform resolution tasks flawlessly. Self-service delivers concrete results. Knowledge moves from support to enablement.

Strategic Implications for Service Desk Leadership

A paradigm shift occurs when knowledge management and service desk activities become strategic competencies. An organization experiences improvements when it comes to first contact resolutions, mean time to resolutions, and self-service use. The time taken to train an agent decreases. Service levels reach stability when demand increases.

For leadership, this change means aligning strategically. Knowledge management needs to integrate with other functions of ITSM architecture, automation projects, and experience strategies.

For leadership, this shift requires strategic alignment. Knowledge management must integrate with ITSM architecture, automation initiatives, and experience strategies. Governance architectures need to address matters of ownership and accountability. Investment priorities must also change.

20251229_section_thought-leadership-rethinking-knowledge_6_600x600

Tools are important, but operating models matter even more. Sustainable knowledge practices depend on integration, culture, and investment.

Buchanan Technologies supports organizations in this transition by harnessing ITSM knowledge in combination with service desk activities, processes, and improvement. At Buchanan Technologies, effective ITSM transformation emphasizes service quality and scalability through integrated knowledge management rather than isolated KM initiatives.

Rethinking Knowledge Management‌for the Modern ITSM Stack

Why Knowledge Management Underperforms Despite Widespread Adoption

Where Traditional Knowledge Management Models Break Down

The ITSM Stack Evolves Faster Than Knowledge Management

Reframing Knowledge Management as the Intelligence Layer of ITSM

Strategic Implications for Service Desk Leadership

Rethinking Knowledge Management
‌for the Modern ITSM Stack